Maybe you consider yourself a "branded" Christian--Presbyterian, Baptist, Catholic. Maybe you don't hold your brand loyalty close.
Either way, you've wondered about denominations. Do they matter for religious life today?
It's a question Presbyterians are asking right now--is our denomination dying... and if it is, is it worth saving? I've spent most of my life as a member of Presbyterian Church (USA) congregations and am ordained (and I get a paycheck) in that tradition. I've attended two non-denominational seminaries (Union NYC and Fuller) and have worked in a church for six years that is functionally non-denominational (Marble Collegiate in NYC). My own experience with denominations is that they are small-minded, culturally-limited, and completely necessary.
Denominations are the vehicles by which people experience Christianity. There is no Christian life that stands outside of the Christian family tree--and the branches are all denominations; even non-denominational churches are responding (in their structure and substance) to denominationalism. Denominational identity 1) shapes the structure and style of worship, 2) denominations validate certain ways of thinking and talking about the experience of God (and invalidate others), 3) they communicate in their organizational structures how the tradition understands power, authority, and proper modes of decision-making within the community of the church, and 4) they do the work of translating a transcendent concept ("church") into a particular cultural setting in which it can be lived by flesh-and-blood bodies.
If you say that denominations don't matter, you're not giving credit to how much denominational "vessels" shape our experience of the faith. If you were to attend worship at Marble Collegiate Church in New York, a member of the Reformed Church in America, you would receive the sacrament of Communion four times a year (a vestige in some Reformed churches). How central would the sacrament be to the Christian life if you attend Marble, as opposed to the Church of the Transfiguration (Episcopal) around the corner, where they share the Eucharist every day? Juxtapose the centrality of the sermon at Marble against your local Catholic parish--or measure the sense of the Spirit's movement in human bodies in an Episcopal Church against the movement in bodies in a Pentecostal Church. The things churches emphasize in their common life, the things they leave alone, the things they do well, the things they couldn't do if you paid them--these differences are embedded in the particuar histories of the respective denominations. In many cases, denominational uniquenesses were chosen and upheld by the originators of the denomination out of a sense that God needed them to be that particular way. It's not an exaggeration to say that the founders of many church movements that became denominations bled and died for their uniqueness. Theologically, Christians may talk about being "one body" and having "one Lord, one faith, one baptism," but every denomination does something unique that distinguishes itself from the others and makes the experience of the faith within that tradition substantively different for those who inhabit it.
Denominations are what shapes your experience of Christianity. The best analogy for denominations I can come up with is that of a family's role in an individual's development. It is the air you breath, the water you swim in. It's dysfunctions are yours. Its modes of being seep into your unconscious mind, even if you can't name them until you end up on a therapist's couch decades later. Denominations are family--love it or leave it, you will always have one.
But as important as denominations are in principle and in practice, particular denominations still teeter precariously on the verge of irrelevancy for the Christian life, as Presbyterians are finding out.
Denominations are cultural constructs. They take their shapes and forms and ways of "doing Church" within particular socio-historical moments. Presbyterianism grows out of 16th century Western Europe; it is impossible to tease apart the influences of those origins from the shape of Presbyterian life. Denominations don't "unlearn" the customs and habits of their genesis moments, because those customs and habits get woven into the core statements defining who and what that tradition is and believes. Presbyterianism, deeply embedded in 16th century Western Europe (and arguably even more deeply embedded in mid-20th century American culture as the central pillar of mainline Protestantism), struggles to adapt itself to the cultural patterns, aesthetics, and philosophical modes of 21st century America. Is anyone surprised?
Denominations feel permanent because they last; they last because they work. The ones that survive manage to capture a way of being Christian that makes sense to people. Ironically, "making sense" to a critical mass of people in a given cultural context may be exactly what ends up infecting a denomination with the disease that eventually kills them. Denominations "divinize" their longevity and success, and forget how contextually-rooted and therefore transient their corporate life really is.
The Presbyterian Church USA may have a "sickness unto death." It may have been infected by last century's "success"; it may be playing out Reformed Protestantism's seemingly endless process of one-upsmanship and schism; it may be one denomination among many that is being overwhelmed and transformed by seismic sociological changes that are shifting American living patterns, ways of thinking, and cultural connections. This may be death--or just a change that feels like a death.
I hope the PCUSA doesn't die--not soon. I think that the way it makes decisions is pretty amazing--trying to grant power to the people in the pews. Our polity system tries to protect minority perspectives while granting majority rule. Presbyterians have an ordination process that emphasizes good theological education and psychological health among clergy. Our theological tradition has valued theological depth, and because of that depth, it has valued theological diversity. It's a good denomination. It actually works pretty well.
But even if it dies in my lifetime, I won't weep. It will die because its inherent limitations made it unsuitable for modern life. Some other denominational identity will have grown up to replace it.
Christianity does not--it cannot--exist apart from the structural vessels that hold it. Denominations are flawed human creations... but without them and without the ways they allow us to be people of faith together, we have no access to a God any larger than the God of our self.

I tried hard not to comment, so as not to be guilty of hyperbolic support :-)---but wow oh wow ---this was as good as it gets for shaping my thinking on about a thousand questions. If you will allow a leap from denomination to religion, you sounded like Gandhi!
ReplyDelete"Religions are like mothers. There are many good ones, but you love your own the best."
Very well thought out and stated. My father taught me that "a non-denominational church is more accurately described as a very small denomination". Here is a link to a brief rhyme of mine on denomination:
ReplyDeletehttp://ericlwoods.tumblr.com/post/4039053972/denomination
God bless, ELW
This is winsomely thoughtful and incredibly helpful. Thanks very much. I will be reposting it to others in the PC(USA) who are following the work of our Middle Governing Body Commission.
ReplyDeleteTod Bolsinger
oh no no no! just because it has shaped us and we have grown dependent on it, does not mean that that is good. perhaps our shape would be more beautiful for the Master's use without it. and dependency on anything impure / manmade, with dysfunction, regardless of motive, is idolatry isn't it?! no no no i don't believe in denominations and i do believe that if Jesus were here in human form, He would not choose a certain denomination to attend and would not want us to do that either.
ReplyDeletewhere in Scripture does it uphold denominationalism?
no it says "don't follow Appollo or Paul" but follow Christ!
I don't know that we're talking about "following" denominations so much as identifying with styles of worship, maybe. At least that's what it is for me. A particular denomination isn't a way to salvation, obviously, just a way to "belong", in the human sense.
ReplyDeleteWe are all one body, divided into various members. We have tended to overspecialize, which seems to have been our trait throughout the traceable history of the body of Christ. Worse, we tend to think that our denomination (or non-denomination) is better than others. No eye, no matter how keen its vision, can be a better hand than the most fractured hand, and neither eye nor hand can be a good knee.
ReplyDeleteYours in Christ,
Be Well,
Bob Griffin
Great posting, thanks for it!
ReplyDeleteGod's blessings to you!
dm
I love what you said here. The "PCUSA" is my disfunctional arm and family the body of Christ. It has not been particulary good to me and it tried to keep me out of the ministry, though in the end I stared it down. It lets me be shaped by Calvin and Luther and Thomas Merton and GK Chesterton and TN Wright and serve where I I could never have served otherwise.
ReplyDeleteGreat thoughts, well expressed. As a pastor in the PC (USA) I could not agree more with what you expressed. Denomiations have brought good, helped, and are not not without value. But for all too many their perspective and love of the denomination is dangerously close to violating the first commandment. I went into this work because Jesus changed my life and I love him for it. My experience, repeated over and over, is that denominations just do not get this. They build fences and boundaries, boast in their accomplishments, and describe themselves as the center of God's work. It is time to return to our first love and place Jesus at the center of our work, message, and hearts. Thanks for your wise and well expressed perspective.
ReplyDeleteAs a PC(USA) pastor, I appreciate your comments. You said it best so far, but lots of people are thinking along this same path. This denomination is amazingly willing, in these days, to examine these fundamental core identity issues. Our country came from an 18th century world, and we have managed to keep it relevant in the 21st - why not our denomination as well? I believe the Spirit is blowing newness through the halls built so long ago. I hope so. Blessings.
ReplyDeleteWe need to unify and become one church again. It started out as one church and needs to go back to one church. It was one church for thousands of years. Christ said to St Peter 'upon this rock I shall build my Church'. He did not say churches.
ReplyDeleteRevelations predicts that it will be one church again, near the end.
David - I really like this post - a lot said well, and thoughtfully. I'm going to be in touch w/you to discuss an event here in 2012 - want some input from you on it, :-)
ReplyDeleteAnd GulfShoresSteven - is from my presbytery - recoged him from the comment list.
SFE
Just found this - excellent way to talk about denominations - as family.
ReplyDeleteAnd while we are family, we are also part of other systems as well. In addition to giving ways of worship, a vocabulary of faith and structures, denominations also have been the vehicles that deliver services. For years local churches collected offerings and sent them to regional bodies that sent out missionaries. Now many churches have groups that go and do that from the church. Educational materials used to have the brand of the denomination. Now they can be chosen from across a wide spectrum. Denomination still credential pastoral leaders and regulate the call/appointment systems.
We need to continue to think and talk about what it means to be Christian within our culture. Thanks for helping me think about this some more.